Yesterday, Treasury and the IRS released final and temporary regulations under Section 7701 meant to clarify issues related to the employment of owners of disregarded entities.  In 2009, the IRS issues regulations that required disregarded entities be treated as a corporation for purposes of employment taxes including federal income tax withholding and Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) taxes for Social Security and Medicare.  The regulations provided that a disregarded entity was disregarded, however, for purposes of self-employment taxes and included an example that demonstrated the application of the rule to an individual who was the single owner of a disregarded entity.  In the example, the disregarded entity is treated as the employee of its employees but the owner remains subject to self-employment tax on the disregarded entity’s activities.  In other words, the owner is not treated as an employee.

Rev. Rul. 69-184 provides that partners are not employees of the partnership for purposes of FICA taxes, Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) tax, and federal income tax withholding.  This is true even if the partner would qualify as an employee under the common law test.  This made it difficult—if not impossible—for partnerships to allow employees to participate in the business with equity ownership such as options even if the employee owned only a very small portion of the partnership.  The 2009 regulations raised questions, however, provided some hope that a disregarded entity whose sole owner was a partnership could be used to as the employer of the partnership’s partners. Doing so would have allowed partners in the partnership to be treated as employees of the disregarded entity and participate in tax-favored employee benefit plans, such as cafeteria plans.  The final and temporary regulations clarify that that an individual who owns and portion of a partnership may not be treated as an employee of the partnership or of a disregarded entity owned by the partnership.

As a result, payments made to partners should not be reported on Form W-2, but should be reported on Schedule K-1.  Such payments are not subject to federal income tax withholding or FICA taxes, but will be subject to self-employment taxes when the partner files his or her individual income tax return.  In addition, if partners are currently participating in a disregarded entity’s employee benefit plans, such as a health plan or cafeteria plan, the plan has until the later of August 1, 2016, or the first day of the latest-starting plan year following May 4, 2016.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of S. Michael Chittenden S. Michael Chittenden

Michael Chittenden practices in the areas of tax and employee benefits with a focus on withholding taxes, including state and federal employment taxes, Chapter 3, and the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and information reporting (e.g., Forms 1095, 1096, 1098, 1099, W-2…

Michael Chittenden practices in the areas of tax and employee benefits with a focus on withholding taxes, including state and federal employment taxes, Chapter 3, and the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and information reporting (e.g., Forms 1095, 1096, 1098, 1099, W-2, 1042, and 1042-S.

Michael advises large employers on their employment tax compliance obligations, including the special FICA and FUTA rules for nonqualified deferred compensation, the successor employer rules, and executive perquisites, such as the taxation of company cars, corporate aircraft (including the use of SIFL valuations), and employer-provided housing. In addition, he has worked with clients to submit voluntary corrections of employment tax mistakes and seek abatement of late deposit and information reporting penalties. Michael has extensive controversy experience representing clients in IRS examinations and before the IRS Independent Office of Appeals in employment tax, late deposit, and information reporting penalty cases.

As part of Covington’s Global Workforce Solutions practice, Michael counsels clients on all aspects of mobile workforce issues including state income tax withholding for remote workers and mobile employees. He also advises on treaty claims and various tax issues related to expatriate and inpatriates.