Early this morning, the House of Representatives passed a reconciliation bill that would enact significant tax provisions and spending cuts.  The House Bill now heads to the Senate, where changes are likely before passage.  This article is one of a series of articles discussing various proposals in the legislation that touch on tax withholding, reporting, and fringe benefits.

The House bill would expand the application of tax on excess compensation for tax-exempt organizations by redefining a covered employee as one who receives income in excess of $1 million annually. 

Under current law, nonprofits with executives earning over $1 million are subject to a 21 percent excise tax on the amount over $1 million for the top five earners under section 4960.  The excise tax rate is calculated by multiplying the corporate tax rate by the sum of any remuneration in excess of $1 million paid to a covered employee for a taxable year, and any excess parachute payment paid to a covered employee.

The House bill would retain the 21 percent excise tax but expand “covered employees” to include all current and former employees earning over $1 million.  In other words, the proposal would remove the “top five earners” threshold, and instead apply the excise tax to all nonprofit employees earning over $1 million. 

In the original version of the bill, a “covered employee” included the employees of the tax-exempt entity and any related person or governmental entity.  However, the House-passed bill removed related persons or governmental entities, clarifying that the excise tax will only be applied in relation to remuneration of current and former employees of the organization and retaining the current carveouts under the section 4960 regulations for employees of related entities for services provided to those entities.

Although this bill is not yet law, nonprofit employers should evaluate their executive compensation packages and policies to determine which, if any, employees earn over $1 million, to calculate the potential impact of the 21 percent excise tax on such compensation.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Christina Danberg Bubel Christina Danberg Bubel

Christina Danberg Bubel is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office, where she is a member of the Tax Practice Group. Christina also maintains an active pro bono practice.

Christina earned her J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center, where she mentored…

Christina Danberg Bubel is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office, where she is a member of the Tax Practice Group. Christina also maintains an active pro bono practice.

Christina earned her J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center, where she mentored law students in legal writing as part of the Law Fellow Program.

Photo of S. Michael Chittenden S. Michael Chittenden

Michael Chittenden practices in the areas of tax and employee benefits with a focus on withholding taxes, including state and federal employment taxes, Chapter 3, and the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and information reporting (e.g., Forms 1095, 1096, 1098, 1099, W-2…

Michael Chittenden practices in the areas of tax and employee benefits with a focus on withholding taxes, including state and federal employment taxes, Chapter 3, and the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and information reporting (e.g., Forms 1095, 1096, 1098, 1099, W-2, 1042, and 1042-S.

Michael advises large employers on their employment tax compliance obligations, including the special FICA and FUTA rules for nonqualified deferred compensation, the successor employer rules, and executive perquisites, such as the taxation of company cars, corporate aircraft (including the use of SIFL valuations), and employer-provided housing. In addition, he has worked with clients to submit voluntary corrections of employment tax mistakes and seek abatement of late deposit and information reporting penalties. Michael has extensive controversy experience representing clients in IRS examinations and before the IRS Independent Office of Appeals in employment tax, late deposit, and information reporting penalty cases.

As part of Covington’s Global Workforce Solutions practice, Michael counsels clients on all aspects of mobile workforce issues including state income tax withholding for remote workers and mobile employees. He also advises on treaty claims and various tax issues related to expatriate and inpatriates.

Photo of Susan Leahy Susan Leahy

Susan Leahy has advised tax-exempt, nonprofit organizations on tax and corporate governance matters for over 25 years. She assists organizations in obtaining and maintaining tax-exempt status and advises boards and senior executives on a range of governance policies and procedures.

In her work…

Susan Leahy has advised tax-exempt, nonprofit organizations on tax and corporate governance matters for over 25 years. She assists organizations in obtaining and maintaining tax-exempt status and advises boards and senior executives on a range of governance policies and procedures.

In her work with tax-exempt organizations that operate in the United States, as well as internationally, Susan regularly:

Counsels clients on the tax implications involving:

Self-dealing, inurement, and impermissible private benefit to individuals and for-profit companies;
Lobbying, and political activities;
Unrelated business income tax;
Excess benefit transactions and compensation of executives;
Joint ventures and relationships with for-profit organizations;
Mergers of tax-exempt organizations and the acquisition or donation of assets; and
Corporate sponsorship.

Advises nonprofit boards of directors, board committees, and management with respect to:

Corporate formation and good governance principles;
Preparation for board and committee meetings; and
Conflicts of interests.
Provides guidance on state corporate and tax compliance for nonprofit organizations.

“Susan has been my ‘Go-To’ attorney for adept legal strategy and guidance for over 20 years. Susan skillfully led our organization’s volunteer leadership through a needed transition with compassion and sensitivity. Her legal assistance remains invaluable!” a nonprofit organization client noted.

“I highly value Susan’s expertise, responsiveness, and pragmatism,” said another client. “Her insight and advice have proven invaluable time and time again and remain integral to our ability to operate quickly and nimbly.”

Susan is the past chair of the Exempt Organizations Committee of the District of Columbia Bar and a member of the American Bar Association. Susan received her J.D. from Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law and a B.B.A. from St. Bonaventure University.