Tax Policy

The House today passed the Senate-passed version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1) (“OBBBA”), which includes a number of major tax provisions, including a number of provisions that would affect withholding and information reporting obligations (see prior coverage here, here, here, here, here, and here—note that earlier coverage of some other provisions in the original House bill were dropped or modified from the legislation that was ultimately enacted).

One provision that was in the original House-proposed legislation but then removed before it passed the House found its way back into the final legislation that ultimately passed the House and Senate. Section 112205 of OBBBA includes enforcement provisions related to COVID-Related Employee Retention Credits. That credit was originally enacted as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act in 2020 and then extended and expanded in 2021. The credit, which was modeled on a credit previously used for physical disasters such as hurricanes and wildfires, was intended to cover a portion of employer’s payroll costs to encourage them to keep employees on payroll and was similar to programs enacted in other countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Unfortunately, the credit became mired in IRS delays as the IRS struggled to process the influx of claims amid staffing shortages of its own. The IRS released guidance in the form of FAQs, which this blogged detailed, and then later in more formal notices, which became more restrictive over time. (See our earlier three-part series on IRS guidance: here, here, and here.) In the face of this guidance, a cottage industry began advising employers on the credit, some of whom took increasingly aggressive positions in the view of the IRS—and in the views of some tax professionals. Section 112205 of OBBBA is a response to those perceived abuses.

OBBBA (1) retroactively suspends some pending claims for the employee retention credit; (2) extends the limitation period on assessments for some employee retention credit claims; (3) extends the penalty on excess refunds to employment taxes; and (4) adds a new of enforcement provisions targeting “COVID-ERTC Promoters.”Continue Reading Reconciliation Bill Affects Pending ERC Claims; Cracks Down on ERC Promoters

After being passed by the House of Representatives, this year’s reconciliation bill (H.R. 1) moved to the Senate, which passed its own version of the legislation today, July 1.  The Senate bill would preserve without significant change many tax-related items from the House bill.  There are several provisions, however, where the Senate bill varies from the version the passed the House earlier.  The Senate-passed legislation will now head back to the House, where its fate is somewhat uncertain.

We previously covered several of the relevant tax provisions when House passed its version of the reconciliation bill.  This article is part of a series of articles examining how those provisions would change under the Senate’s legislation.

The Senate-passed bill contains a new edition of the No Tax On Tips provision, adopting aspects of the provision included in both the House reconciliation bill passed by the House of Representatives (the “House Bill”) (see prior coverage) and in the previous standalone Senate bill on No Tax On Tips (“S. 129”) (see prior coverage).Continue Reading Senate Reconciliation Bill Retains No Tax on Tips Provision with Some Changes

After being passed by the House of Representatives, this year’s reconciliation bill (H.R. 1) moved to the Senate, which passed its own version of the legislation today, July 1.  The Senate bill would preserve without significant change many tax-related items from the House bill.  There are several provisions…

Continue Reading Senate Reconciliation Bill Drops Unpopular UBTI Proposal for Transportation Fringes

After being passed by the House of Representatives, this year’s reconciliation bill (H.R. 1) moved to the Senate, which passed its own version of the legislation today, July 1.  The Senate bill would preserve without significant change many tax-related items from the House bill.  There are several provisions, however, where the Senate bill varies from the version the passed the House earlier.  The Senate-passed legislation will now head back to the House, where its fate is somewhat uncertain.

We previously covered several of the relevant tax provisions when House passed its version of the reconciliation bill.  This article is part of a series of articles examining how those provisions would change under the Senate’s legislation.

As discussed in our prior post, the House bill would provide a new deduction for “qualified overtime compensation” under a new section 225 of the Code.  The Senate bill preserves the deduction for qualified overtime compensation but makes some changes.  To begin, the Senate bill would limit the annual deduction for qualified overtime to compensation to $12,500 ($25,000 for taxpayers filing a joint return).  The House bill did not include a cap.Continue Reading Senate Reconciliation Bill Would Retain Tax Deduction for Overtime Pay, Subject to Certain Restrictions

The House of Representatives continues work on a reconciliation bill that would enact significant tax provisions and spending cuts.  The various legislative committees have completed work on the areas of the bill within their jurisdiction, including the Ways and Means Committee, which proposed language that would enact $3.8 trillion in tax cuts over the next ten years.  Over the weekend, the House Budget Committee consolidated the legislation, and the House Bill is now before the Rules Committee, where a managers’ amendment may be considered before it heads to the House floor.  This article is one of a series of articles discussing various proposals in the legislation that touch on tax withholding, reporting, and fringe benefits.

The House Bill includes legislative language that would implement President Trump’s campaign proposal to eliminate the taxation of tipped income, at least temporarily.  The language would allow a below-the-line deduction for certain tips received by an individual in an occupation in which tips are ordinarily received.  However, several requirements, including those relating to the nature of the tip, the characteristics of the individual receiving the tip, and the relevant industry, must be satisfied.  The provision would be effective for tips received on or after January 1, 2025, and would sunset after 2028—leaving its extension to a future Congress during a presidential election year.  In addition, the legislation would extend availability of the FICA tip tax credit under Section 45B of the Code, which currently applies to food and beverage establishments, to employers within the beauty service industry.Continue Reading House Reconciliation Bill Would Enact President Trump’s Campaign Promise to Eliminate Tax on Tips

The House of Representatives continues work on a reconciliation bill that would enact significant tax provisions and spending cuts.  The various legislative committees have completed work on the areas of the bill within their jurisdiction, including the Ways and Means Committee, which proposed language that would enact $3.8 trillion in tax cuts over the next ten years.  Over the weekend, the House Budget Committee consolidated the legislation, and the House Bill is now before the Rules Committee, where a managers’ amendment may be considered before it heads to the House floor.  This article is one of a series of articles discussing various proposals in the legislation that touch on tax withholding, reporting, and fringe benefits.

The House Bill proposes various changes to the Internal Revenue Code, including a new deduction for “qualified overtime compensation” under new section 225 of the Code.  The proposal would enact one of President Trump’s campaign promises.Continue Reading House Reconciliation Bill Would Enact Tax Deduction for Overtime Pay

On March 9, 2023, the U.S. Department of Treasury released the Greenbook (formally known as the General Explanation of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals) for FY 2024 to explain revenue proposals included in the Administration’s budget.  One proposal is to increase the number of hours required to be worked by an individual for the employer to be eligible for the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC).Continue Reading Treasury Greenbook Includes Proposal to Alter Work Opportunity Tax Credit

As we have been discussing in recent blog posts, the Treasury Department released its Fiscal Year 2024 General Explanations of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals, commonly called the “Green Book,” on March 9, 2023. This year’s Green Book includes a proposal that both employers and employees are likely to embrace: an enhanced tax credit for employers that provide childcare.Continue Reading Administration Proposes Increased Childcare Tax Credit for Employers

Last week, the Treasury Department released the “Green Book,” formally known as the General Explanations of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals.  For the second year in a row, the Green Book addresses the treatment of “on-demand” pay arrangements also known as “daily pay” or “earned wage access programs.”  These arrangements permit employees to access a portion of their earned wages in advance of the employee’s normal pay date. 

These programs raise potential tax concerns because, depending upon the program design, the employee could be considered to be in “constructive receipt” of their wages as soon as they earn them.  This creates payroll withholding and depositing obligations for employers regardless of whether the employee actually receives a wage payment.  In addition, the program can cause uncertainty regarding how to properly calculate the required FICA tax and income tax withholdings when the employee elects to receive a payment of earned wages.  For this reason, some programs (which are often app-based) are structured as loans or attempt to avoid the constructive receipt issue by requiring the payment of a small fee when the earned wages are paid.Continue Reading Treasury Reiterates Position on “On-Demand” Pay

Last week, the Treasury Department released the “Green Book,” formally known as the General Explanations of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals.  Among its proposals, the Green Book includes a new proposal that could signal stepped-up enforcement of section 409A, as well as a new tool for the IRS.  Section 409A, adopted almost two decades ago, represented a significant shift in the tax treatment of non-qualified deferred compensation plans.  Prior to its adoption, these plans often relied on traditional concepts of constructive receipt to determine when it was required that a plan participant recognize income.  Section 409A overlaid those principles with significant new rules regarding the time that an election to defer compensation must be made, as well as limitations on the time and form of payment of deferred compensation.
Continue Reading Administration Proposes New Withholding Requirements for 409A Failures